|
|
Post by jamnjon on Feb 17, 2023 11:53:01 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by bellizar on Feb 17, 2023 12:02:56 GMT -8
Don't really get the Furlong + Laroque before Kniazev or even Havelid. In rankings like this is always confusing me, this how good they are know or they projected potential? What are the exact sience here or just ranking them by scouts opinions who are all have some kind of different perspective.... |
|
|
|
Post by unshorkable on Feb 17, 2023 12:19:57 GMT -8
Don't really get the Furlong + Laroque before Kniazev or even Havelid. In rankings like this is always confusing me, this how good they are know or they projected potential? What are the exact sience here or just ranking them by scouts opinions who are all have some kind of different perspective.... I think your confusion is totally warranted. I personally think even when they specify their own approach, I’ve noticed that writers don’t always keep to the spirit of their exercise. Not that I’m especially blaming them—I think good lists are not often based on one single criterium, but when it’s based on multiple criteria, it can be hard to convey why one ranking versus the other. |
|
